Putting Creditors in Their Rightful Place: Corporate Governance and Business Ethics in the Light of Limited Liability [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):21-32 (2011)
Contemporary academic and policy discussions of corporate governance tend to accord primacy to the interests of shareholders. While the primacy (descriptive or prescriptive) of shareholders is argued for in various ways, others seek to promote a wider stakeholder model of the firm and its governance. In both cases, the interests of creditors tend to be neglected. In this paper, the fundamental position of creditors in a system of corporate law that offers limited liability is reasserted and explained, and the implications explored. It is demonstrated that there are, in effect, two modes of governance possible for a limited liability corporation: the “normal” mode, when shareholders’ interests are primary, and the “distressed” mode, when creditors’ interests are paramount. As a result of this analysis, writers on corporate governance who are influenced by certain managerial myths or economic theories of the firm are encouraged to view the position of shareholders in a more informed light. Writers on business ethics, who often find themselves contending, perhaps implicitly, with inappropriate understandings of the nature of business corporations and their governance, are similarly alerted to the weakness of certain positions perceived as antithetical to their agenda. Finally, business ethicists who advocate a stakeholder perspective are encouraged to recognize the position of creditors and to pay more attention to them as a stakeholder group
Keywords Bankruptcy  Company law  Corporate governance  Creditors  Governance  Limited liability  Shareholder primacy  Stakeholder theory  Suppliers  Trade creditors
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1190-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Missing the Target.John Hendry - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):159-176.
Business Ethics.Tom Sorell - 1994 - Butterworth-Heinemann.
Distributive Justice in Firms.Ian Maitland - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):129-143.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ethical Issues That Arise in Bankruptcy.Jacques Boettcher, Gerald Cavanagh & Min Xu - 2014 - Business and Society Review 119 (4):473-496.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Exploring Theoretical Paradigms in Corporate Governance.Clive Smallman - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):78-94.
An Appraisal of Shareholder Proportional Liability.Gordon G. Sollars - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):329-345.
Corporate Governance in Mexico.Bryan W. Husted & Carlos Serrano - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):337 - 348.
Employee Governance and the Ownership of the Firm.John R. Boatright - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):1-21.
Ethics, Corporations, and Governance.Wesley Cragg & Dirk Matten - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):1-4.
Theorising South Africa's Corporate Governance.Andrew West - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):433 - 448.
New Directions in Corporate Governance and Finance.Robert W. Kolb - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (4):673-694.
Corporate Governance in South Africa.G. J. Rossouw, A. van der Watt & D. P. Malan Rossouw - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289 - 302.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #385,561 of 2,191,806 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,783 of 2,191,806 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature