Res Publica 14 (3):193-201 (2008)

This paper argues that Article 8 of the ECHR, as applied to the protection of a person’s right to wear a headscarf, is an inappropriate locus for thrashing out arguments about the right to protection of religious freedom, and that Article 9 allows for a broader legal and political analysis of the multiple meanings and impacts of religion in our lives. However, the law should not prohibit women from wearing the headscarf. Legal regulation of the headscarf should be replaced with robust political debate about the many diverse and intersecting ways in which it is possible to experience womanhood, sexuality, culture, religion, race, nationality and economic security in the twenty-first century.
Keywords Headscarf  Religion  Autonomy  Harm
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-008-9067-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Unveiling The Headscarf Debate.Dawn Lyon & Debora Spini - 2004 - Feminist Legal Studies 12 (3):333-345.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
38 ( #275,053 of 2,432,669 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #294,596 of 2,432,669 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes