Judgment, Deliberation, and the Self-effacement of Moral Theory

Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (3):289-302 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ExtractIn developing moral theories, philosophers seek to fulfill at least two tasks: to guide moral judgment and to guide moral deliberation. In moral judgment, moral agents assess moral status. In moral deliberation, moral agents decide how to act. It is important to work out how these two things are related. One suggestion is to posit a direct connection between them according to which moral agents are required to deliberate in terms of correct moral judgment. There are various ways of spelling out this requirement. For example, moral agents might be required to rank prospective actions according to a correct moral judgment of them and choose the highest ranked action. Moral agents would thus be required to choose the morally best action available to them. Alternatively, moral agents might be required to separate prospective actions into those that are permissible actions and those that are impermissible and choose, perhaps on non-moral grounds, from the class of morally permissible actions

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,945

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Agent-based Theories of Right Action.Damian Cox - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (5):505-515.
Kantian Group Agency.Amy L. MacArthur - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 154 (4):917-927.
Actions, Agents, and Consequences.Re’em Segev - 2023 - Criminal Justice Ethics 42 (2):99-132.
Global Warming and the Problem of Failed Intentions.Evelyn Brister - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 3 (1):247-271.
Moral responsibility and moral development in Epicurus’ philosophy.Susanne Bobzien - 2006 - In Burkhard Reis & Stella Haffmans, The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mind Perception is the Essence of Morality.Kurt Gray, Liane Young & Adam Waytz - 2012 - Psychological Inquiry 23 (2):101-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-04

Downloads
57 (#407,272)

6 months
7 (#590,730)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Damian Cox
Bond University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The schizophrenia of modern ethical theories.Michael Stocker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (14):453-466.
The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.Michael Stocker - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote, Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Virtue ethics is self-effacing.Simon Keller - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):221 – 231.
Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing?Glen Pettigrove - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):191-207.
Is Agent-Based Virtue Ethics Self-Undermining?William Ransome - 2010 - Ethical Perspectives 17 (1):41-57.

Add more references