Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2020)

Authors
Donovan Cox
Nazarbayev University
Abstract
The central problem of this dissertation arises from reflecting on Euthyphro’s often neglected final attempt to define piety and the discussion that follows. He claims that piety is knowledge of how to give to the gods what is pleasing in prayer and sacrifice. Socrates, without much argument, reduces Euthyphro’s answer to his earlier, already refuted one – that piety is what is dear to the gods – inviting the question of whether this is all the elenchos is meant to accomplish. If it is not, we should expect to find its purpose in the brief discussion that falls between Euthyphro’s definition and the final reduction of this definition to its predecessor. At the center of this discussion Socrates compares Euthyphronic piety to commerce. This comparison has classically been interpreted as showing Euthyphro’s definition to imply that humans can benefit gods, and since Euthyphro has elsewhere rejected this idea, his definition is refuted by contradiction. But this strands the reduction withoutpurpose, and scrutiny of the text suggests this is not the correct way to interpret the inference structure of this intervening discussion. In this dissertation I argue for two main theses: the disambiguation thesis, which claims that the comparison to commerce is not the philosophical point of the elenchos, and does not result in the refutation of Euthyphro’s definition. It is instead intended to elicit which of two possible models of piety Euthyphro means to describe, the language of his definition being equivocal in at least one important respect, namely whether or not a met need necessarily confers a benefit upon the recipient; the translation thesis, which claims that there are some important observations to be made about the Greek of Euthyphro’s definition, observations that will make the dis- ambiguation thesis more plausible, and which are obscured by traditional translations of the passage under discussion. These observations concern kecharismena, a word often translated as ‘pleasing’, but is better understood as denoting a broad set of social and religious norms, and for which there is no simple English equivalent. Together, these two theses allow us to see that the main philosophical lesson of the last elenchos is that Euthyphro’s account of piety as ritual is an application of his more famous third attempt to define piety voluntaristically, and that any philosophical concerns over the last definition are consequences of it being an extension of the third one. This is why Plato puts the two side-by-side to close the dialogue, and we are kept from seeing this clearly when we take the comparison to commerce to be accomplishing the main work of the elenchos, rather than as clarifying Euthyphro’s answer so that its conceptual similarities to the previous answer are plainly visible. I conclude the project by defending the venerable view that Socratic piety is service to the gods instantiated by rational inquiry, and show how this model of piety is the antithesis to, and moral remedy for, Euthyphronic piety.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Piety in Response to Euthyphro’s Hubris.Will Britt - 2018 - Ancient Philosophy 38 (2):265-287.
Euthyphro's Thesis Revisited.Panos Dimas - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (1):1-28.
Socrates' Piety from View of Euthyphro.Li-Ling Gu - 2007 - Modern Philosophy 3:127-132.
Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro.William E. Mann - 1998 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):123-142.
Holiness, Piety, and Philosophy: A Study of Plato's "Euthyphro".David Dwight Thayer - 1982 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Socrates on the Definition of Piety.S. Marc Cohen - 1971 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (1):1-13.
Piety: Lending a Hand to Euthyphro.William E. Mann - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1):123-142.
Plato’s Euthyphro on Divine and Human Wisdom.Wayne Ambler - 2019 - In Paul J. Diduch & Michael P. Harding (eds.), Socrates in the Cave: On the Philosopher’s Motive in Plato. Springer Verlag. pp. 233-250.
The Irony of Contingency and Solidarity.Timothy Cleveland - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (272):217 - 241.
Doing Business with the Gods.Steven A. M. Burns - 1985 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2):311 - 325.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-26

Total views
12 ( #788,533 of 2,454,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,768 of 2,454,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes