A Debate on God and Morality: What is the Best Account of Objective Moral Values and Duties?

New York, NY: Routledge. Edited by Erik J. Wielenberg & Adam Lloyd Johnson (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key Features A valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Shermer On Morality.Christian Miller - 2016 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:63-68.
Facts, Values and Moral Realism.David Schejbal - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Connecticut
Traditional Morality and Sacred Values.David McPherson - 2017 - Analyse & Kritik 39 (1):41-62.
Mind-Independent Values Don’t Exist, But Moral Truth Does.Maarten Van Doorn - 2017 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism ; Vol 25, No 1 25 (1):5-24.
Islamic values: a distinctive framework for moral education?J. Mark Halstead - 2007 - Journal of Moral Education 36 (3):283-296.
Animal morality: What is the debate about?Simon Fitzpatrick - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (6):1151-1183.
Duty and Distance.Conrad Heilmann & Constanze Binder - 2017 - Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (3):547-561.


Added to PP

25 (#518,436)

6 months
9 (#118,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Erik Wielenberg
DePauw University
William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University

Citations of this work

A New Moral Argument for the existence of God.Andrew Ter Ern Loke - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 93 (1):25-38.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references