Consciousness and Cognition 22 (4):1174-1180 (2013)

It has consistently been shown that agents judge the intervals between their actions and outcomes as compressed in time, an effect named intentional binding. In the present work, we investigated whether this effect is result of prior bias volunteers have about the timing of the consequences of their actions, or if it is due to learning that occurs during the experimental session. Volunteers made temporal estimates of the interval between their action and target onset , or between two events . Our results show that temporal estimates become shorter throughout each experimental block in both conditions. Moreover, we found that observers judged intervals between action and outcomes as shorter even in very early trials of each block. To quantify the decrease of temporal judgments in experimental blocks, exponential functions were fitted to participants’ temporal judgments. The fitted parameters suggest that observers had different prior biases as to intervals between events in which action was involved. These findings suggest that prior bias might play a more important role in this effect than calibration-type learning processes
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2013.08.001
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Awareness of Action: Inference and Prediction.James Moore - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1):136-144.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Efficient Convergence Implies Ockham's Razor.Kevin Kelly - 2002 - Proceedings of the 2002 International Workshop on Computational Models of Scientific Reasoning and Applications.
The “Bias” Bias in Social Psychology: Adaptive When and How?James Friedrich - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):335-336.
Two Grades of Evidential Bias.Paul M. Churchland - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):250-259.
Interpretation of Tests of Heterogeneity and Bias in Meta‐Analysis.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):951-957.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #852,621 of 2,507,637 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,637 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes