AI and Society:1-12 (forthcoming)

Abstract
By looking at the politics of classification within machine learning systems, this article demonstrates why the automated interpretation of images is an inherently social and political project. We begin by asking what work images do in computer vision systems, and what is meant by the claim that computers can “recognize” an image? Next, we look at the method for introducing images into computer systems and look at how taxonomies order the foundational concepts that will determine how a system interprets the world. Then we turn to the question of labeling: how humans tell computers which words will relate to a given image. What is at stake in the way AI systems use these labels to classify humans, including by race, gender, emotions, ability, sexuality, and personality? Finally, we turn to the purposes that computer vision is meant to serve in our society—the judgments, choices, and consequences of providing computers with these capacities. Methodologically, we call this an archeology of datasets: studying the material layers of training images and labels, cataloguing the principles and values by which taxonomies are constructed, and analyzing how these taxonomies create the parameters of intelligibility for an AI system. By doing this, we can critically engage with the underlying politics and values of a system, and analyze which normative patterns of life are assumed, supported, and reproduced.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s00146-021-01162-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,448
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Data Set’s Ruins.Nicolas Malevé - forthcoming - AI and Society.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Archaeologists of the Off-Screen: Harun Farocki and Trevor Paglen.Henrik Gustafsson - 2019 - In Asbjørn Grønstad & Øyvind Vågnes (eds.), Invisibility in Visual and Material Culture. Springer Verlag. pp. 17-45.
Banana Classification Using Deep Learning.Ahmed F. Al-Daour, Mohammed O. Al-Shawwa & Samy S. Abu-Naser - 2020 - International Journal of Academic Information Systems Research (IJAISR) 3 (12):6-11.
A Neutrosophic Image Retrieval Classifier.A. A. Salama, Eisa Mohamed & A. E. Fawzy - 2017 - International Journal of Computer Applications 170 (9):1-6.
Detection and Classification of Gender-Type Using Convolution Neural Network.Husam R. Almadhoun - 2021 - International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) 4 (12):15-20.
Deep Learning Classification of Peach Fruits.AlKahlout Mohammad - 2020 - International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) 3 (12):35-40.
Peach Type Classification Using Deep Learning.Mohammed I. El-Kahlout & Samy S. Abu-Naser - 2020 - International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) 3 (12):35-40.
Apple Fruits Classification Using Deep Learning.Shawwa Mohammad - 2020 - International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) 3 (12):1-6.
On the Data Set’s Ruins.Nicolas Malevé - forthcoming - AI and Society.
Classification of Apple Fruits by Deep Learning.Mohammed O. Al-Shawwa & Samy S. Abu-Naser - 2020 - International Journal of Academic Engineering Research (IJAER) 3 (12):1-7.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-06-12

Total views
29 ( #374,857 of 2,445,937 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #25,516 of 2,445,937 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes