AbstractThis thesis explores the significance of Godel's Theorem for an understanding of law as rules, and of legal adjudication as rule-following. It argues that Godel's Theorem, read through Wittgenstein's understanding of rules and language as a contextual activity, and through Derrida's account of 'undecidability,' offers an alternative account of the relationship of judging to justice. Instead of providing support for the 'indeterminacy' claim, Godel's Theorem illuminates the predicament of undecidability that structures any interpretation and every legal decision, and which constitutes the opening to justice. The first argument in this thesis examines Godel's proof, Wittgenstein's views on rules, and Derrida's undecidability, as manifestations of a common concern with the limits of what can be formalized. The meta-argument examines their misinterpretation and misappropriation within legal theory as a case study of just what they mean about meaning, context, and justice as necessarily co-implicated.
Similar books and articles
Query the Triple Loophole of the Proof of Gödel Incompleteness Theorem.Fangwen Yuan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 41:77-94.
Wittgenstein as His Own Worst Enemy: The Case of Gödel's Theorem.Mark Steiner - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):257-279.
The Surprise Examination Paradox and the Second Incompleteness Theorem.Shira Kritchman & Ran Raz - unknown
Recursion Theory for Metamathematics.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1993 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Abstract Complexity Theory and the Mind-Machine Problem.Albert E. Lyngzeidetson & Martin K. Solomon - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):549-54.
On the Philosophical Relevance of Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems.Panu Raatikainen - 2005 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 59 (4):513-534.
Existentially Closed Structures and Gödel's Second Incompleteness Theorem.Zofia Adamowicz & Teresa Bigorajska - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):349-356.
Prose Versus Proof: Wittgenstein on Gödel, Tarski and Truth.Juliet Floyd - 2001 - Philosophia Mathematica 9 (3):280-307.
T-Schema Deflationism Versus Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem.Christopher Gauker - 2001 - Analysis 61 (2):129–136.
Edgar Morin's Paradigm of Complexity and Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem.Yi-Zhuang Chen - 2004 - World Futures 60 (5 & 6):421 – 431.
The Gödel Paradox and Wittgenstein's Reasons.Francesco Berto - 2009 - Philosophia Mathematica 17 (2):208-219.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Force of Law: The 'Mystical Foundation of Authority'.Jacques Derrida - 2002 - In Gil Anidjar (ed.), Acts of Religion.
Remarks on Deconstruction and Pragmatism.Jacques Derrida - 1996 - In Simon Critchley & Chantal Mouffe (eds.), Deconstruction and Pragmatism. Routledge. pp. 84.