Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):511-512 (2002)
I claim that our desire to be special motivates us to suppose that if we were not God created, we must be self-created. I also claim that Stephen J Gould's claims about punctuated equilibrium, the absence of directional selection, and exaptations, when taken together, lead to kind of secular creationism. I introduce the notion of “adaptive effects” and argue that a focus on the actual physiological and psychological mechanisms that produce adaptations provides a way out of the exaptation dilemma.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom?Michael J. Reiss - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Rhapsodic Evolution: Essay on Exaptation and Evolutionary Pluralism.Telmo Pievani - 2002 - World Futures 59 (2):63 – 81.
Lack of Evidentiary Criteria for Exaptations?James L. Dannemiller - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
Towards a Pluralistic Concept of Function Function Statements in Biology.Rob Pranger - 1990 - Acta Biotheoretica 38 (1):63-71.
A Defense of Creationism in Fiction.Jeffrey Goodman - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
The Creationist Fiction: The Case Against Creationism About Fictional Characters.Stuart Brock - 2010 - Philosophical Review 119 (3):337-364.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads19 ( #256,080 of 2,158,667 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,589 of 2,158,667 )
How can I increase my downloads?