Nature, nurture, and universal grammar

Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2):139-186 (2001)
Abstract
In just a few years, children achieve a stable state of linguistic competence, making them effectively adults with respect to: understanding novel sentences, discerning relations of paraphrase and entailment, acceptability judgments, etc. One familiar account of the language acquisition process treats it as an induction problem of the sort that arises in any domain where the knowledge achieved is logically underdetermined by experience. This view highlights the cues that are available in the input to children, as well as childrens skills in extracting relevant information and forming generalizations on the basis of the data they receive. Nativists, on the other hand, contend that language-learners project beyond their experience in ways that the input does not even suggest. Instead of viewing language acqusition as a special case of theory induction, nativists posit a Universal Grammar, with innately specified linguistic principles of grammar formation. The nature versus nurture debate continues, as various poverty of stimulus arguments are challenged or supported by developments in linguistic theory and by findings from psycholinguistic investigations of child language. In light of some recent challenges to nativism, we rehearse old poverty-of stimulus arguments, and supplement them by drawing on more recent work in linguistic theory and studies of child language.
Keywords Competence  Linguistics  Metaphysics  Nativism  Universal Grammar
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1005694100138
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Language as Shaped by the Brain.Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):489-509.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Nativism: In Defense of the Representational Interpretation.Glen Hoffmann - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (27):303-315.
Brass Tacks in Linguistic Theory.Stephen Grain, Andrea Gualmini & Paul Pietroski - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 1--175.
Brass Tacks in Linguistic Theory: Innate Grammatical Principles.Stephen Crain, Andrea Gualmini & Paul M. Pietroski - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. pp. 1--175.
Nature, Nurture and Universal Grammar.Paul Pietrowski - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2):139 - 186.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

263 ( #11,507 of 2,146,310 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #91,304 of 2,146,310 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums