Navigating negative quantificational space
This paper reports the ﬁndings from an interconnected set of experiments designed to assess children’s knowledge of the semantic interactions between negation and quantiﬁed NPs. Our main ﬁnding is that young children, unlike adults, systematically interpret these elements on the basis of their position in overt syntax. We argue that this observation can be derived from an interplay between fundamental properties of universal grammar and basic learning principles. We show that even when children’s semantic knowledge appears to diﬀer from that of adults, the observed diﬀerences..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Question–Answer Requirement for Scope Assignment.Andrea Gualmini, Sarah Hulsey, Valentine Hacquard & Danny Fox - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (3):205-237.
Similar books and articles
Young Children's Representations of Spatial and Functional Relations Between Objects.Rachel Keen & Elizabeth S. Spelke - unknown
Semantics of the Transitive Construction: Prototype Effects and Developmental Comparisons.Paul Ibbotson, Anna L. Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (7):1268-1288.
Brass Tacks in Linguistic Theory: Innate Grammatical Principles.Stephen Crain, Andrea Gualmini & Paul M. Pietroski - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. pp. 1--175.
I Can Trust You Now … but Not Later: An Explanation of Testimonial Knowledge in Children.Joshue Orozco - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (2):195-214.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads6 ( #563,676 of 2,178,175 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,175 )
How can I increase my downloads?