Please pass the peas: psychology, philosophy and welcome boundaries

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (5):607-614 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article argues that the data presented in Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds are of greater interest to psychologists than to philosophers, and cautions experimental philosophers against some experimental shortcomings in the use of self-report and vignettes.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rate abuse: A reply to Olson.Ian Phillips - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):503-505.
Ayn Rand and Austrian Economics: Two Peas in a Pod.Walter Block - 2005 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 6 (2):259 - 269.
Alfarabi on philosophy and religion.Muhsin Mahdi - 1972 - Philosophical Forum 4 (1):5.
Passing as Privileged.Daniel Silvermint - 2018 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5.
Locks, Schlocks, and Poisoned Peas: Boyle on Actual and Dispositive Qualities.Dan Kaufman - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 3:153-198.
The Present Position in Psychology.James Drever - 1932 - Philosophy 7 (27):311 - 319.
The Challenge and Limits of Psychology to Theological Ethics.Don Browning - 1999 - The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics 19:133-143.
Liao Ping's Compromise on Studies of Sanzhuan and His Sanzhuan Zhezhong.Pei Zhao - 2007 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:59-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-17

Downloads
8 (#1,138,312)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Patricia W. Cheng & Keith J. Holyoak - 1985 - Cognitive Psychology 17 (4):391-416.

Add more references