Philosophia Christi 22 (1):55-61 (2020)

Authors
William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University
Abstract
Murray and Churchill argue correctly that theistic evolution as they define it is theologically compatible with orthodox Christian doctrines concerning divine providence, natural theology, miracles, and immaterial souls. I close with some reflections on mutual misunderstandings of Intelligent Design proponents and theistic evolutionists that arise because each sees the other as a distorted mirror image of himself.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/pc20202214
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,739
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mere Theistic Evolution.Michael J. Murray & John Ross Churchill - 2020 - Philosophia Christi 22 (1):7-41.
On Mere Theistic Evolution.Thomas H. McCall - 2020 - Philosophia Christi 22 (1):43-54.
Spirituality, Expertise, and Philosophers.Bryan Frances - 2008 - In Jon Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 44-81.
Methodological Naturalism and the Truth Seeking Objection.Erkki Kojonen - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (3):335-355.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-08-06

Total views
9 ( #858,989 of 2,340,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #71,402 of 2,340,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes