Manuscrito 42 (4):387-438 (2019)

Authors
Adam Crager
University of California, Los Angeles
Abstract
This article sketches, and works to motivate, a controversial approach to Posterior Analytics II.19. But its primary goal is to recommend a novel solution to one particular interpretive aporia that’s especially vexed recent scholars working on Post. An. II.19. The aporia concerns how to understand the enigmatic "ē ek pantos" ( “or from all...”) in the genealogical account of foundational knowledge at II.19 100a3-9. Our proposed solution to the aporia is discussed in connection with a number of larger philosophical issues concerning Aristotle’s theory of epistēmē.
Keywords Aristotle  episteme
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1590/0100-6045.2019.v42n4.ac
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Aristotle's Notion of Experience.Pavel Gregorić & Filip Grgić - 2006 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 88 (1):1-30.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle's Two Worlds: Posterior Analytics 1.33.Gail Fine - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (3pt3):323-46.
The Relationship of Aristotle's Two Analytics.Robin Smith - 1982 - Classical Quarterly 32 (2):327-335.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-21

Total views
60 ( #170,388 of 2,427,648 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #86,222 of 2,427,648 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes