Mind and Language 25 (1):30-65 (2010)
We present a series of arguments for logical nativism, focusing mainly on the meaning of disjunction in human languages. We propose that all human languages are logical in the sense that the meaning of linguistic expressions corresponding to disjunction (e.g. English or , Chinese huozhe, Japanese ka ) conform to the meaning of the logical operator in classical logic, inclusive- or . It is highly implausible, we argue, that children acquire the (logical) meaning of disjunction by observing how adults use disjunction. Findings from studies of child language acquisition and from cross-linguistic research invite the conclusion that children do not learn to be logical—it comes naturally to them.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism.Robert Brandom - 2000 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
True to the Power of One? Cognition, Argument, and Reasoning.Drew Michael Khlentzos & Bruce Stevenson - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):82-83.
Literacy and the Languages of Rationality.David R. Olson - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (3):431-447.
Literacy and the Languages of Rationality.David R. Olson - 2013 - Pragmatics and Cognitionpragmatics and Cognition 21 (3):431-447.
Similar books and articles
On The Sense and Reference of A Logical Constant.Harold T. Hodes - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):134-165.
The Acquisition of Disjunction: Evidence for a Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures.Luisa Meronib - unknown
The Acquisition of Disjunction: Evidence for a Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures.Stephen Crain - manuscript
Added to index2010-01-19
Total downloads89 ( #59,098 of 2,178,178 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,178 )
How can I increase my downloads?