The Language of Thought: No Syntax Without Semantics

Mind and Language 5 (3):187-213 (1990)

Tim Crane
Central European University
Many philosophers think that being in an intentional state is a matter of being related to a sentence in a mental language-a 'Language of Thought' (see especially Fodor 1975, 1987 Appendix; Field 1978). According to this view-which I shall call 'the LT hypothesis'-when anyone has a belief or a desire or a hope with a certain content, they have a sentence of this language, with that content, 'written' in their heads. The claim is meant quite literally: the mental representations that make up the items of this language have semantic and syntactic properties. This is why, according to this view, cognitive psychology does, and should, treat that part of the mind which deals with intentional states as a semantic and a syntactic 'engine'.
Keywords Language  Metaphysics  Semantics  Syntax  Thought
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0017.1990.tb00159.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.

View all 61 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Computation Without Representation.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):205-241.
Naturalising Representational Content.Nicholas Shea - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (5):496-509.
Functionalism, Computationalism, and Mental Contents.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (3):375-410.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
564 ( #5,440 of 2,320,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #10,862 of 2,320,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature