Foundations of Science 1 (2):285-297 (1995)

Abstract
It is widely believed that empiricism, though once dominant, is now extinct. This turns out to be mistaken because of incorrect assumption about the initial dominance of logical empiricism and about the content and variety of logical empiricist views. In fact, prominent contemporary philosophers (Quine and Kuhn) who are thought to have demolished logical empiricism are shown to exhibit central views of the logical empiricists rather than having overthrown them.
Keywords Logical empiricism  Carnap R.  Quine W.V.O.  Kuhn T
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00124614
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 61,008
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
From a Logical Point of View.W. V. O. Quine - 1953 - Harvard University Press.
The Logical Syntax of Language.Rudolf Carnap - 1937 - London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co..

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Whence Philosophy of Biology?Jason M. Byron - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (3):409-422.
Philipp Frank’s Austro-American Logical Empiricism.Thomas Mormann - 2017 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7 (1): 56 - 86.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
62 ( #167,871 of 2,439,468 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #433,243 of 2,439,468 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes