Pragmatics and Cognition 4 (2):423-427 (1995)

Authors
Abstract
A discussion of one of the three books by which McCloskey launched his own economic rhetoric. The main criticism is that McCloskey enlarged view of rhetoric is still not encompassing enough, being limited to rhetoric in the writing of economic literature, while leaving the function of metaphor and other tropes in the more basic processes of conceptualization, theory change, and construction of 'observed' phenomena.
Keywords rhetoric  methodology  economics  relativism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1995, 1996
DOI 10.1075/pc.4.2.15cre
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Metaphors in the Wealth of Nations.Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi - 2002 - In Boehm Stephan, Christian Gehrke, Heinz D. Kurz & Richard Sturn (eds.), Is There Progress in Economics? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. pp. 89-114.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Economic Method and Economic Rhetoric.John Maloney - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (2):253-268.
The Very Idea of Epistemology.Donald McCloskey - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (1):1.
How Economists Persuade.Donald N. McCloskey - 1994 - Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1):15-32.
Reply to Munz.Donald N. McCloskey - 1990 - Journal of the History of Ideas 51 (1):143.
Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.J. Anthony Blair - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):71-81.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II).D. H. Monro - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):238 – 253.
Letters.Don Lavoie, Donald N. McCloskey & Peter Hoffenberg - 1987 - Critical Review 1 (3):109-134.
A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1965 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):264 – 291.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-18

Total views
55 ( #168,557 of 2,329,886 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #41,542 of 2,329,886 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes