Gerald Bruns's Cavell

Critical Inquiry 17 (3):609-615 (1991)

Abstract
Years ago, before Arnoldian poetic touchstones had become quite as unpopular as they are now, I and my fellow college undergraduates found a touchstone of sorts in a poem by Edna St. Vincent Millay. The cherished line read:Plato alone looked upon beauty bare.For us, this line became the touchstone, not of poetic sublimity but of being poetic, which is to say of attaining a consummate inane pretentiousness in poetic diction and intellectual attitude alike. Millay, we thought, had done it once and for all.Today, of course, nobody has any use for touchstones, and if we erstwhile undergraduates were to reread Millay we might well come away feeling ashamed of our former arrogance, juvenile conceit, and no doubt sexism. Still, Millay’s line has a memorably vacuous, oracular ring to it. That is the ring I keep hearing in Gerald Bruns’s “Stanley Cavell’s Shakespeare” . “Cavell … alone perhaps with Martin Heidegger, has a sense of what is at stake in this quarrel [between philosophy and poetry]” . “Exposure to reality is what happens in Hamlet, although it occurs nowhere so powerfully as in Lear” . “This was the later Heidegger’s idea: poetry … puts everything out of the question” . “The face, like the world , requires me to forego knowing” . “Proving the existence of the human proved to be a separate problem that did not get clearly formulated until Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and E. T. A. Hoffmann’s ‘The Sandman’” . Philosophers and cultural historians may make what they will of these vatic disclosures, but it may strike those who study Shakespeare that Bruns is recycling lugubrious clichés about Hamlet and Lear while simultaneously upping the philosophical ante for them. This, however, is roughly the procedure that Bruns wants to pass off as Cavell’s. Jonathan Crewe, professor of English at Dartmouth College, is the author of Trials of Authorship: Anterior Forms and Poetic Reconstruction from Wyatt to Shakespeare
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/448600
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,365
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bruns, Gerald Cavell+ Reading Shakespeare.Jonathan Crewe - 1991 - Critical Inquiry 17 (3):609-615.
Stanley Cavell's Shakespeare.Gerald L. Bruns - 1990 - Critical Inquiry 16 (3):612-632.
Reply to Crewe and Conant.Gerald L. Bruns - 1991 - Critical Inquiry 17 (3):635-638.
On Bruns, on Cavell.James Conant - 1991 - Critical Inquiry 17 (3):616-634.
The Obscurity of Modern Poetry.Gerald L. Bruns - 1964 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 39 (2):180-198.
A Question of the Truth of Mimesis.Gerald L. Bruns - 1985 - Renascence 37 (3):166-170.
On the Tragedy of Hermeneutical Experience.Gerald L. Bruns - 1988 - Research in Phenomenology 18 (1):191-201.
Echoes After Heidegger.Gerald L. Bruns - 1991 - International Studies in Philosophy 23 (3):144-145.
Habermas on Historical Materialism.Gerald L. Bruns - 1990 - Review of Metaphysics 44 (2):430-431.
A Theory of Turbulence.Gerald Bruns - 2005 - The European Legacy 10 (5):503-507.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-17

Total views
7 ( #893,031 of 2,271,741 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #823,834 of 2,271,741 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature