Jurgen Habermas, Fatti e norme [Book Review]

Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 91 (1):142-150 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The evolution of Habermas follows that of Rawls in Political Liberalism, where the principles of justice are traced back to a historical background and no longer derived from an original position as in A Theory of Justice; and even Rawls, curiously enough, while he made his own the criticism in a broad sense Hegelian, of opponents such as Walzer,continued not to recognize the debt he now owed them. Appropriations of the opponents' objections, withdrawals disguised as victories, ad hoc distinctions and so on, are common staple in disputes between thinkers, phenomena that it would be too easy to dismiss with accusations of tendentiousness or lack of rigour.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rawls and Habermas on religion in the public sphere.Melissa Yates - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (7):880-891.
The Habermas Rawls Debate.James Gordon Finlayson - 2019 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls in Germany.Jan-Werner Müller - 2002 - European Journal of Political Theory 1 (2):163-179.
Avez-vous lu Rawls ?Bjarne Melkevik - 1997 - Philosophiques 24 (1):59-70.
Habermas II.David Rasmussen & James Swindal (eds.) - 2009 - Los Angeles: SAGE.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-18

Downloads
111 (#147,534)

6 months
37 (#87,117)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sergio Volodia Marcello Cremaschi
Università Cattolica di Milano (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references