Maintaining underclasses via contrastive judgement: Can inclusive education ever happen?

British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):431-446 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Borrowing from epidemiological and economic analysis, we argue that the central constructs by which children are judged educationally rest in contrastive judgements and that such judgements are based on 'everyday' constructs - not objective descriptors. But because these everyday constructs become seemingly objectified by the procedures and discourses of education, they appear reliable and objective. The insistent process of contrastive judgement based on these everyday constructs has its result in cohorts of children forever being judged unfavourably next to others. A model to frame the process is outlined and consequences for children's acceptance and inclusion are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
21 (#761,941)

6 months
5 (#711,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Mismeasure of Man.Stephen Jay Gould - 1980 - W.W. Norton and Company.
Inequality Re-examined.David Archard & Amartya Sen - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):553.
Equality.R. H. Tawney - 1932 - International Journal of Ethics 43 (1):99-102.

View all 8 references / Add more references