Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (3):284-320 (2008)

Abstract
The commentaries on our target article, reflect the multidisciplinary yet highly fragmented state of current studies of human social cognition. Progress in our understanding of the human social brain must come from studies that integrate across diverse analytic levels, using conceptual frameworks grounded in evolutionary biology
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X08004457
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,178
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thought and Language.A. L. Wilkes, L. S. Vygotsky, E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (55):178.
'Superstition' in the Pigeon.B. F. Skinner - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (2):168.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

God, the Meaning of Life, and a New Argument for Atheism.Jason Megill & Daniel Linford - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (1):31-47.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Conceptual Contribution to Battles in the Brain.Harry Smit - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):803-821.
What is a Gene? From Molecules to Metaphysics.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):471-497.
Genes Can Disconnect the Social Brain in More Than One Way.André Aleman & René S. Kahn - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):855-855.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
22 ( #496,574 of 2,454,913 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #98,312 of 2,454,913 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes