Authors
Cristina Lafont
Northwestern University
Abstract
In this essay, I analyze the cosmopolitan project for a new international order that Habermas has articulated in recent publications. I argue that his presentation of the project oscillates between two models. The first is a very ambitious model for a future international order geared to fulfill the peace and human rights goals of the UN Charter. The second is a minimalist model, in which the obligation to protect human rights by the international community is circumscribed to the negative duty of preventing wars of aggression and massive human rights violations due to armed conflicts such as ethnic cleansing or genocide. According to this model, any more ambitious goals should be left to a global domestic politics, which would have to come about through negotiated compromises among domesticated major powers at the transnational level. I defend the ambitious model by arguing that there is no basis for drawing a normatively significant distinction between massive human rights violations due to armed conflicts and those due to regulations of the global economic order. I conclude that the cosmopolitan goals of the Habermasian project can only be achieved if the principles of transnational justice recognized by the international community are ambitious enough to cover economic justice
Keywords Global poverty  Global justice  Habermas  Human rights  Cosmopolitanism  Distributive justice  Realistic utopias  Negative duties
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3402/egp.v1i1.1813
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Egalitarianism, Ideals, and Cosmopolitan Justice.Gillian Brock - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (1):1–30.
Motivating Cosmopolitanism? A Skeptical View.Patti Tamara Lenard - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (3):346-371.
Motivating the Global Demos.Daniel Weinstock - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (1):92-108.
From Aquinas to Zwelethemba: A Brief History of Hope.John Cartwright - 2004 - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Cosmopolitanism or Agonism? Alternative Visions of World Order.Paulina Tambakaki - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (1):101-116.
The Global Ecological Crisis and the Ideology of Gaebyeok and Sangsaeng.Jeong Hyoung Wook - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:45-49.
Cultural Visions of Technology.Lauge Baungaard Rasmussen - 2013 - AI and Society 28 (2):177-188.
Equal Standing in the Global Community.Rekha Nath - 2011 - The Monist 94 (4):593-614.
Can Democracy Go Global?Cristina Lafont - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (1):13-19.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
41 ( #266,683 of 2,462,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,768 of 2,462,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes