The Monist 53 (1):14-39 (1969)

Abstract
I. The word ‘history’ and its derivatives are used in many different senses among modern philosophers, theologians, and historians. While we need not rehearse here the various meanings of the word in current use, it will serve our purpose to call attention to a very general distinction which seems quite essential to any attempt to do so. Some meanings of ‘history’ or ‘historical’ refer to an actual course of events as they occur or are enacted. Other meanings refer to the recollection, the piecing together, the reconstruction and interpretation of such a course of events after it has occurred, pre-eminently through the scholarly craft of the historian. Admittedly, even this innocent sounding distinction is fraught with difficulties. It is not as though there were an independent access to past events which could dispense with the historian’s methods. But to every event there is one relationship that requires no access at all: that of its participants, who enact it and are directly affected by it. They are in the event and it, so to speak, is in them. Indeed, though there are nonhuman factors in any event, it is the transaction of human participants which makes the event historical, which, in fact, constitutes the historical event.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist196953120
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Concept of Fate in Mencius.Ning Chen - 1997 - Philosophy East and West 47 (4):495-520.
Fate and Humanity.Xunwu Chen - 2010 - Asian Philosophy 20 (1):67 – 77.
Fate and Destiny: Some Historical Distinctions Between the Concepts.Richard W. Bargdill - 2006 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 26 (1-2):205-220.
On Fate and Fatalism.Robert C. Solomon - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (4):435-454.
Fate, Logic, and Time.Steven M. Cahn - 1967 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
Evidence, Miracles, and the Existence of Jesus.Stephen Law - 2011 - Faith and Philosophy 28 (2):129-151.
Why Me?: A Philosophical Inquiry Into Fate.Michael Gelven - 1991 - Northern Illinois University Press.
Beyond Fate.Margaret Visser - 2002 - House of Anansi Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
28 ( #397,094 of 2,462,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,363 of 2,462,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes