Phronesis 59 (3):231-245 (2014)

Roger Crisp
Oxford University
This paper suggests that we understand Aristotle’s notion of nobility as what is morally praiseworthy, arguing that nobility is not to be understood impartially, that Aristotle is an egoist at the level of justification , and that he uses the idea of the noble as a bridge between self-interest and moral virtue. Implications for contemporary ethics are discussed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/15685284-12341267
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,518
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Methods of Ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1874 - Thoemmes Press.
Natural Goodness.Philippa Foot - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Persons, Character, and Morality.Bernard Williams - 1981 - In James Rachels (ed.), Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge University Press.
The Schizophrenia of Modern Ethical Theories.Michael Stocker - 1976 - Journal of Philosophy 73 (14):453-466.
The Humean Theory of Motivation.Michael Smith - 1987 - Mind 96 (381):36-61.

View all 37 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Tracking Eudaimonia.Paul Bloomfield - 2018 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 10 (2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #169,089 of 2,421,643 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #68,296 of 2,421,643 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes