Categorical Requirements: Kant and Hume on the Idea of Duty

The Monist 74 (1):83-106 (1991)
If the theory advanced below is correct, then what is the difference (I know she [Philippa Foot]] will ask) between the moral must/must not and the must/must not of etiquette or the clubhouse? Looking forward to the conclusion I shall reach, let me reply, roughly and readily, that the difference will reside not in anything formal but in the depth, spread, and felt authority of the attachments to which the moral must/must not appeals-and categorically appeals.
Keywords motive of duty  categorical requirement  hypothetical requirement
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist19917413
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
238 ( #18,663 of 2,237,240 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #144,358 of 2,237,240 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature