Expectation and Assent in Seventeenth-Century Scientific Argument Galileo and Others

&
Istituto Antonio Banfi (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Expectation and Assent in Seventeenth-Century Scientific Argument: Galileo and Others.A. C. Crombie - 1992 - Istituto Antonio Banfi Annali.
Was the scientific revolution really a revolution in science?Gary Hatfield - 1996 - In Jamil Ragep & Sally Ragep (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation: Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-Modern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma. Brill. pp. 489–525.
Swineshead on Falling Bodies: An Example of Fourteenth-Century Physics.M. A. Hoskin & A. G. Molland - 1966 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (2):150-182.
The Rise of Modern Science: When and Why?R. Hooykaas - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):453-473.
Science and instruments: The telescope as a scientific instrument at the beginning of the seventeenth century.Yaakov Zik - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (3):259-284.
Galileo's French correspondents.Frederic J. Baumgartner - 1988 - Annals of Science 45 (2):169-182.
The “rational disagreement” between galilean science and baroque maraviglia.Luigi Ingaliso - 2007 - Archivio di Storia Della Cultura 20.
Reenacting Galileo's Experiments: Rediscovering the Techniques of Seventeenth‐Century Science. [REVIEW]Joseph Pitt - 2009 - Isis 100:661-662.
Metaphysics and the new science.Gary Hatfield - 1990 - In David C. Lindberg & Robert S. Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by and (Cambridge:). Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–166.
Galileo, Bruno and the rhetoric of dialogue in seventeenth-century natural philosophy.Stephen Clucas - 2008 - History of Science 46 (4):405.
Expectation, Modelling and Assent in the History of Optics: Part I. Alhazen and the Medieval Tradition.A. C. Crombie - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (4):605.
The Cambridge Companion to Galileo (JR Milton).P. Machamer - 2000 - Philosophical Books 41 (1):29-30.
Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion.John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.) - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Mechanics Lost: Husserl’s Galileo and Ihde’s Telescope.Harald A. Wiltsche - 2017 - Husserl Studies 33 (2):149-173.
Torricelli's correspondence on ballistics.Michael Segre - 1983 - Annals of Science 40 (5):489-499.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references