Preferential parental investment in daughters over sons
Human Nature 2 (4):387-417 (1991)
Abstract
Female-biased parental investment is unusual but not unknown in human societies. Relevant explanatory models include Fisher’s principle, the Trivers-Willard model, local mate and resource competition and enhancement, and economic rational actor models. Possible evidence of female-biased parental investment includes sex ratios, mortality rates, parents’ stated preferences for offspring of one sex, and direct and indirect measurements of actual parental behavior. Possible examples of female-biased parental investment include the Mukogodo of Kenya, the Ifalukese of Micronesia, the Cheyenne of North America, the Herero of southern Africa, the Kanjar of south Asia, the Mundugumor of New Guinea, contemporary North America, and historical Germany, Portugal, and the United StatesDOI
10.1007/bf02692198
My notes
Similar books and articles
Predicting cross-cultural patterns in sex-biased parental investment and attachment.Robert J. Quinlan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):40-41.
Does Investment in the Sexes Differ When Fathers Are Absent?Mhairi A. Gibson - 2008 - Human Nature 19 (3):263-276.
Reproductive strategies and sex-biased investment.Susan Scott & C. J. Duncan - 1999 - Human Nature 10 (1):85-108.
Beyond the “Cinderella effect”.Robert L. Burgess & Alicia A. Drais - 1999 - Human Nature 10 (4):373-398.
Men’s reproductive investment decisions.Coren L. Apicella & Frank W. Marlowe - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (1):22-34.
Trivers-willard rules for sex allocation.Judith L. Anderson & Charles B. Crawford - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (2):137-174.
Urbanization and Daughter-Biased Parental Investment in Fiji.Dawn B. Neill - 2011 - Human Nature 22 (1-2):139-155.
Historical perspectives on parental investment and childbearing.Maris A. Vinovskis - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (4):329-336.
Parental investment theory and birth sex ratios in nepal.S. S. Strickland & V. R. Tuffrey - 1997 - Journal of Biosocial Science 29 (3):283-295.
The effects of residential locality on parental and alloparental investment among the Aka foragers of the Central African Republic.Courtney L. Meehan - 2005 - Human Nature 16 (1):58-80.
The Behavioral Ecology of Family Planning.Donna L. Leonetti, Dilip C. Nath & Natabar S. Hemam - 2007 - Human Nature 18 (3):225-241.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
8 (#989,013)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2013-11-24
Downloads
8 (#989,013)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Birth order, sibship size, and status in modern Canada.Jennifer Nerissa Davis - 1997 - Human Nature 8 (3):205-230.
Resource Competition and Reproduction in Karo Batak Villages.Geoff Kushnick - 2010 - Human Nature 21 (1):62-81.
Trivers-willard rules for sex allocation.Judith L. Anderson & Charles B. Crawford - 1993 - Human Nature 4 (2):137-174.
Why do mothers favor girls and fathers, boys?Ricardo Godoy, Victoria Reyes-García, Thomas McDade, Susan Tanner, William R. Leonard, Tomás Huanca, Vincent Vadez & Karishma Patel - 2006 - Human Nature 17 (2):169-189.
References found in this work
Observational Study of Behavior: Sampling Methods.Jeanne Altmann - 1974 - Behaviour 49 (3/4):227-67.
Intention versus behaviour in parental sex preferences among the Mukogodo of Kenya.Lee Cronk - 1991 - Journal of Biosocial Science 23 (2):229-240.
Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. [REVIEW]Erich Fromm - 1936 - Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 5 (1):128-129.
Grain Prices and Vital Statistics in a Portuguese Rural Parish, 1671–1720.U. M. Cowgill & H. B. Johnson - 1971 - Journal of Biosocial Science 3 (3):321-329.