International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):187-205 (2003)
AbstractAs soon as we attend to the subject, either by asking questions or by making statements about it, we ipso facto make the subject the object of our attention. The question then is whether we can get behind the subject as object and attain the subject as subject. Is the project not self-refuting? For an answer I invoke the parallel case of insight into insight. We cannot imagine the act of insight and so cannot understand it directly, but we can construct symbols of insight, understand them, and thus indirectly achieve some understanding of it. Lonergan made five attempts to achieve insight into insight; the article examines them one by one and applies them to our parallel case in order to conclude that there is a meaningful sense in which we may attain and speak of the subject as subject
Similar books and articles
Insight and the Subject.Eric James Morelli - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):137-148.
Bernard Lonergan’s Method in Theology: A Theologian Questions His Own Understanding.Giovanni B. Sala - 1997 - Philosophy and Theology 10 (2):469-499.
Reconstituting the Subject: Feminism, Modernism, and Postmodernism.Susan Hekman - 1991 - Hypatia 6 (2):44-63.
Thinking About the Past and Experiencing the Past.Dorothea Debus - 2013 - Mind and Language 28 (1):20-54.
The irrelevance of the subject: Against subject-sensitive invariantism.Jonathan Schaffer - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 127 (1):87-107.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads