Utilitas 2 (1):40-54 (1990)

Bentham's dictum, ‘everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one’, is frequently noted but seldom discussed by commentators. Perhaps it is not thought contentious or exciting because interpreted as merely reminding the utilitarian legislator to make certain that each person's interests are included, that no one is missed, in working the felicific calculus. Since no interests are secure against the maximizing directive of the utility principle, which allows them to be overridden or sacrificed, the dictum is not usually taken to be asserting fundamental rights that afford individuals normative protection against the actions of others or against legislative policies deemed socially expedient. Such non-conventional moral rights seem denied a place in a utilitarian theory so long as the maximization of aggregate happiness remains the ultimate standard and moral goal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800000443
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,147
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Moral Foundation of Rights.James P. Sterba - 1992 - Noûs 26 (2):246-247.
Some Problems of Fairness.James Griffin - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):100-118.
Maximization and Fairness.Kurt Baier - 1985 - Ethics 96 (1):119-129.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Right-Based Utilitarianism.Eldon Soifer - 1988 - Dissertation, University of Oxford (United Kingdom)
Indirect Utility and Fundamental Rights.John Gray - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):73.
Equality & the Rule of Law: R. M. Dworkin & Liberalism.Sheldon Sherwood Wein - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Utilitarianism and Human Rights.Allan Gibbard - 1984 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (2):92.
Spencer's Ethics of Equal Freedom.David P. Weinstein - 1988 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays.David Lyons (ed.) - 1997 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Some Problems in the Justification of Moral Rights.Anton Leist - 1994 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2:43-55.


Added to PP index

Total views
125 ( #70,459 of 2,324,606 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #41,663 of 2,324,606 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes