Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):410-413 (2004)
Debate on the potential and uses of human stem cells tends to be conducted by two constituencies—ethicists and scientists. On many occasions there is little communication between the two, with the result that ethical debate is not informed as well as it might be by scientific insights. The aim of this paper is to highlight those scientific insights that may be of relevance for ethical debate.Environmental factors play a significant role in identifying stem cells and their various subtypes. Research related to the role of the microenvironment has led to emphasis upon “plasticity”, which denotes the ability of one type of stem cell to undergo a transition to cells from other lineages. This could increase the value given to adult stem cells, in comparison with embryonic stem cell research. Any such conclusion should be treated with caution, however, since optimism of this order is not borne out by current research.The role of the environment is also important in distinguishing between the terms totipotency and pluripotency. We argue that blastocysts and embryonic stem cells are only totipotent if they can develop within an appropriate environment. In the absence of this, they are merely pluripotent. Hence, blastocysts in the laboratory are potentially totipotent, in contrast to their counterparts within the human body which are actually totipotent. This may have implications for ethical debate, suggesting as it does that arguments based on potential for life may be of limited relevance
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2003.002386
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,023
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Howard J. Curzer - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.
Stem Cells, Altered Nuclear Transfer & Ethics.Norman Ford - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):9.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Norman Ford - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (4):4.
Embryos and Eagles: Symbolic Value in Research and Reproduction.Lisa Bortolotti & John Harris - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (1):22-34.
Social Experiments in Stem Cell Biology.Melinda B. Fagan - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):235-262.
Stem Cell Technology Update.Mariam Ghosn & Ford - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (1):10.
Creating and Sacrificing Embryos for Stem Cells.K. Devolder - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (6):366-370.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
9 ( #546,317 of 2,275,402 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #375,441 of 2,275,402 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature