Ethnocentrism, social contract liberalism and positivistic-conservatism: Rorty's three theses on politics
Res Publica 6 (1):1-23 (2000)
In this article I argue that Rorty has three separatearguments for liberalism. The pragmatic-ethnocentric argument for liberalism,as a system which works for `us liberals'', is rejectedfor entailing relativism. The social contract argument results in an extreme formof individualism. This renders politics redundantbecause there is no need for the (liberal) state toprotect poetic individuals, who are capable ofdefending themselves. Even if the less able areharmed, the state could not prevent this, givenRorty''s arguments about discursive enrichment withina language game. Finally, the positivistic-conservative argument legitimisesliberal politics by fiat, and makes normativediscussion about the status quo illegitimate. Herethe argument is that politics is a matter of reactivetechnical piecemeal problem-solving, to restore theharmony of the status quo. As politics deals with`facts'', normative `problematisations'' of thefunctional status quo are illegitimate (in the public/political sphere). So, either anything goes, andpolitics is redundant, or discussion of politics isdepoliticised and confined to the private sphere.Consequently, Rorty has no way to explore issues ofpower, or normative contestation. Therefore he isunable to address issues of social justice withinliberal democracies, such as feminist arguments aboutan ascribed gender status limiting equalityof opportunity.
|Keywords||equality of opportunity gender liberalism pragmatic-ethnocentric argument Rorty social contract argument|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Postmodern Politics: Rorty on the Self, Agency and Liberalism.Justin Cruickshank - 2007 - Journal of Critical Realism 1 (2).
Richard Rorty's Ironic Liberalism.Michele Marsonet - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:391-403.
Pragmatism and Intolerance: Nietzsche and Rorty.B. Fanning & T. Mooney - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (6):735-755.
Problems with Rorty's Pragmatist Defense of Liberalism.Paul D. Forster - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:345-362.
Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum.Craig L. Carr - 2010 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Why Overcoming Prejudice is Not Enough: A Rejoinder to Richard Rorty.Nancy Fraser - 2000 - Critical Horizons 1 (1):21-28.
After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy.Glen Newey - 2001 - Palgrave.
Liberalism, Ethnocentrism, and Solidarity: Reflections on Rorty.David Rondel - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:55-68.
'Hold the Being': How to Split Rorty Between Irony and Finitude.Rudi Visker - 1999 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (2):27-45.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads48 ( #109,094 of 2,171,746 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,746 )
How can I increase my downloads?