Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):279 - 294 (2012)
AbstractHigh-level theory is the view that high-level properties---the property of being a dog, being a tiger, being an apple, being a pair of lips, etc.---can be represented in perceptual experience. Low-level theory denies this and claims that high-level properties are only represented at the level of perceptual judgment and are products of cognitive interpretation of low-level sensory information (color, shape, illumination). This paper discusses previous attempts to establish high-level theory, their weaknesses, and an argument for high-level theory that does not have these weaknesses.
Similar books and articles
Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content.Tim Bayne - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):385-404.
The Significance of High-Level Content.Nicholas Silins - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (1):13-33.
Two Types of Theories: The Impact of Churchland's Perceptual Plasticity.Peggy DesAutels - 1995 - Philosophical Psychology 8 (1):25-33.
Structure Without Symbols: Providing a Distributed Account of High-Level Cognition.Chris Eliasmith - 1997
High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’.L. R. Franklin-Hall - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):553-577.
High-Level Perception, Representation, and Analogy:A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Methodology.David J. Chalmers, Robert M. French & Douglas R. Hofstadter - 1992 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intellige 4 (3):185 - 211.
Cognitive Penetration and the Perception of Art (Winner of 2012 Dialectica Essay Prize).Dustin Stokes - 2014 - Dialectica 68 (1):1-34.
Drawing the Boundary Between Low-Level and High-Level Mindreading.Frédérique de Vignemont - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (3):457 - 466.
Review: Drawing the Boundary Between Low-Level and High-Level Mindreading. [REVIEW]Frédérique De Vignemont - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (3):457 - 466.
Supervenience and Cosmic Hermeneutics.Terence Horgan - 1984 - Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement 22 (S1):19-38.
E-Z Reader 7 Provides a Platform for Explaining How Low- and High-Level Linguistic Processes Influence Eye Movements.Gary E. Raney - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):498-499.
High-Level Properties and Visual Experience.William Fish - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (1):43-55.
Neuropsychology of High Level Vision: Collected Tutorial Essays : Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition : Papers.Martha J. Farah & Graham Ratcliff (eds.) - 1994 - Lawrence Erlbaum.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Cognitive Penetrability and High‐Level Properties in Perception: Unrelated Phenomena?Berit Brogaard & Bartek Chomanski - 2015 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (4):469-486.
Modular Architectures and Informational Encapsulation: A Dilemma.Dustin Stokes & Vincent Bergeron - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (3):315-38.
Perception and Its Modalities.Dustin Stokes, Mohan Matthen & Stephen Biggs (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
References found in this work
Computation and Cognition: Toward a Foundation for Cognitive Science.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1984 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
Cognitive Penetrability and Perceptual Justification.Susanna Siegel - 2012 - Noûs 46 (2).
Is Vision Continuous with Cognition?: The Case for Cognitive Impenetrability of Visual Perception.Zenon Pylyshyn - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):341-365.