Yes, More Decoherence: A Reply to Critics

Foundations of Physics 47 (11):1428-1463 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently I published an article in this journal entitled “Less interpretation and more decoherence in quantum gravity and inflationary cosmology” :1019–1045, 2015). This article generated responses from three pairs of authors: Vassallo and Esfeld :1533–1536, 2015), Okon and Sudarsky :852–879, 2016) and Fortin and Lombardi. In what follows, I reply to the criticisms raised by these authors.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,764

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Assessing the Montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics.Jeremy Butterfield - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part A):75-85.
Quantum Decoherence: A Logical Perspective.Sebastian Fortin & Leonardo Vanni - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (12):1258-1268.
Decoherence and Wave Function Collapse.Roland Omnès - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (12):1857-1880.
Can Quantum Theory be Applied to the Universe as a Whole?Claus Kiefer - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1410-1418.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-21

Downloads
52 (#269,772)

6 months
2 (#652,025)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elise Marie Crull
City College of New York (CUNY)

Citations of this work

The Metaphysics of Decoherence.Antonio Vassallo & Davide Romano - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (6):2609-2631.

Add more citations