- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The philosophical implications of the loophole-free violation of Bell’s inequality: Quantum entanglement, timelessness, triple-aspect monism, mathematical Platonism and scientific morality.
Abstract
The demonstration of a loophole-free violation of Bell's inequality by Hensen et al. (2015) leads to the inescapable conclusion that timelessness and abstractness exist alongside space-time. This finding is in full agreement with the triple-aspect monism of reality, with mathematical Platonism, free will and the eventual emergence of a scientific morality.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Triple-Aspect Monism and the Ontology of Quantum Particles.Gilbert B. Côté - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):451.
The Failure to Perform a Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Inequality Supports Local Realism.Emilio Santos - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1643-1673.
Empirical consequences of the scientific construction: The program of local hidden-variables theories in quantum mechanics. [REVIEW]Miguel Ferrero & Emilio Santos - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (6):765-800.
About a Generalization of Bell's Inequality.V. M. González-Robles - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (5):839-853.
Mathematical Platonism and the Nature of Infinity.Gilbert B. Côté - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):372-375.
The Quantum World is not Built up from Correlations.Michael Seevinck - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (10):1573-1586.
Platonism and anti‐Platonism: Why worry?Mary Leng - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (1):65 – 84.
The Interpretation of the Factorizability Condition of Bell's Theorem: Implications for Locality and Causality in Quantum Mechanics.Karen D. Snyder - 1998 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Quantum and Concept Combination, Entangled Measurements, and Prototype Theory.Diederik Aerts - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):129-137.
Addressing the Clumsiness Loophole in a Leggett-Garg Test of Macrorealism.Mark M. Wilde & Ari Mizel - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (2):256-265.
“Local Realism”, Bell’s Theorem and Quantum “Locally Realistic” Inequalities.Elena R. Loubenets - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (12):2051-2072.
Stronger-Than-Quantum Correlations.G. Krenn & K. Svozil - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (6):971-984.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-02-08
Downloads
202 (#69,147)
6 months
28 (#57,746)
2016-02-08
Downloads
202 (#69,147)
6 months
28 (#57,746)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values.Sam Harris - 2010 - New York: Free Press.
Mathematical Platonism and the Nature of Infinity.Gilbert B. Côté - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):372-375.
Triple-Aspect Monism and the Ontology of Quantum Particles.Gilbert B. Côté - 2013 - Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):451.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5b5888c749-fsgz8 N