AbstractI argue that Immanuel Kant's critical philosophy—in particular the doctrine of transcendental idealism which grounds it—is best understood as an `epistemic' or `metaphilosophical' doctrine. As such it aims to show how one may engage in the natural sciences and in metaphysics under the restriction that certain conditions are imposed on our cognition of objects. Underlying Kant's doctrine, however, is an ontological posit, of a sort, regarding the fundamental nature of our cognition. This posit, sometimes called the `discursivity thesis', while considered to be completely obvious and uncontroversial by some, has nevertheless been denied by thinkers both before and after Kant. One such thinker is Jakob Friedrich Fries, an early neo-Kantian thinker who, despite his rejection of discursivity, also advocated for a metaphilosophical understanding of critical philosophy. As I will explain, a consequence for Fries of the denial of discursivity is a radical reconceptualisation of the method of critical philosophy; whereas this method is a priori for Kant, for Fries it is in general empirical. I discuss these issues in the context of quantum theory, and I focus in particular on the views of the physicist Niels Bohr and the Neo-Friesian philosopher Grete Hermann. I argue that Bohr's understanding of quantum mechanics can be seen as a natural extension of an orthodox Kantian viewpoint in the face of the challenges posed by quantum theory, and I compare this with the extension of Friesian philosophy that is represented by Hermann's view.
Similar books and articles
The Kantian Framework of Complementarity.Michael Cuffaro - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (4):309-317.
Transcendental Idealism and Ontological Agnosticism.Dustin McWherter - 2012 - Kantian Review 17 (1):47-73.
A Kantian Interpretation of Niels Bohr's Early Correspondence Principle: 1917-1924.Roberto Angeloni - 2017 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 10 (1):8-24.
Kant and Kantian Themes in Recent Analytic Philosophy.Robert Howell - 2013 - Metaphilosophy 44 (1-2):42-47.
Kant’s Epistemological Reorientation of Ontology.Chong-Fuk Lau - 2010 - Kant Yearbook 2 (1):123-146.
Transcendental Philosophy and Quantum Theory.Patricia Kauark-Leite - 2010 - Manuscrito – Rev. Int. Fil 33 (1):243-267.
Transcendental Idealism and the End of Philosophy.Mark Glouberman - 1993 - Metaphilosophy 24 (1-2):97-112.
Kant's Idealism: The Current Debate.Dennis Schulting - 2010 - In Dennis Schulting Jacco Verburgt (ed.), Kant's Idealism. Springer.
Transcendental Idealism: The Dialectical Dimension.M. Glouberman - 1991 - Dialectica 45 (1):31-45.
Kant's Transcendental Problem as a Linguistic Problem.K. Bagchi - 1971 - Philosophy 46 (178):341 - 345.
Immanuel Kant's Theory of Moral Responsibility.Judith Elaine Mcbride - 1982 - Dissertation, Columbia University
Transcendental Philosophy And Quantum Physics.Patrícia Kauark-Leite - 2010 - Manuscrito 33 (1):243-267.
Prolegomena to a Defence of Transcendental Idealism.Randolph Richard Wojtowicz - 1994 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
A Study of Kant's Theoretical Philosophy and Idealism.Camilla Serck-Hanssen - 1996 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Physics and Beyond: Essay review of Kay Herrmann (Ed.): Grete Henry - Hermann: Philosophie – Mathematik – Quantenmechanik. Springer: Wiesbaden 2019, xv + 663 pp. [REVIEW]Guido Bacciagaluppi - 2020 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 51 (4):595-610.
References found in this work
The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics in Historical Perspective.Max Jammer - 1974 - New York: Wiley.