On Thomas Hobbes's Fallible Natural Law Theory

History of Philosophy Quarterly 28 (2):175-190 (2011)

Michael Cuffaro
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
It is not clear, on the face of it, whether Thomas Hobbes's legal philosophy should be considered to be an early example of legal positivism or continuous with the natural-law tradition. On the one hand, Hobbes's command theory of law seems characteristically positivistic. On the other hand, his conception of the "law of nature," as binding on both sovereign and subject, seems to point more naturally toward a natural-law reading of his philosophy. Yet despite this seeming ambiguity, Hobbes scholars, for the most part, have placed him within the legal-positivist tradition. Indeed, Hobbes is usually regarded as the father of legal positivism. Recently, however, a growing number of commentators has begun to question this traditional classification. Although it is clear that Hobbes is not a natural lawyer of the same mold as Thomas Aquinas, it is, nevertheless, increasingly becoming evident that the traditional characterization of Hobbes as a positivist in the same vein as Jeremy Bentham or John Austin is also incorrect. There are important naturallaw aspects of Hobbes's view that one ignores only at the cost of a proper understanding of his theory of law.
Keywords Hobbes  Natural Law Theory  Legal Positivism  Legal Principles  Judicial Discretion  Dworkin
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press.
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 1961 - Oxford University Press UK.
The Morality of Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1964 - Yale University Press.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Physical Explanation for Quantum Computational Speedup.Michael Cuffaro - 2013 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hobbes and the Legitimacy of Law.David Dyzenhaus - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (5):461-498.
Between Natural Law and Legal Positivism: Dworkin and Hegel on Legal Theory.Thom Brooks - 2007 - Georgia State University Law Review 23 (3):513-60.
About Morality and the Nature of Law.Joseph Raz - 2003 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (1):1-15.


Added to PP index

Total views
118 ( #93,994 of 2,463,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,391 of 2,463,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes