Credibilistic Loss Aversion Nash Equilibrium for Bimatrix Games with Triangular Fuzzy Payoffs

Complexity 2018:1-16 (2018)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1155/2018/7143586
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,330
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Loss Aversion in Bimatrix Games.Bram Driesen, Andrés Perea & Hans Peters - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):367-391.
Loss Aversion and Bargaining.Jonathan Shalev - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Loss Aversion in Bimatrix Games.Bram Driesen, Andrés Perea & Hans Peters - 2010 - Theory and Decision 68 (4):367-391.
Probe and Adjust.Simon M. Huttegger - 2013 - Biological Theory 8 (2):195-200.
Games Between Humans and AIs.Stephen J. DeCanio - 2018 - AI and Society 33 (4):557-564.
Loss Aversion and Bargaining.Jonathan Shalev - 2002 - Theory and Decision 52 (3):201-232.
Games, Goals, and Bounded Rationality.Leigh Tesfatsion - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (2):149-175.
The Relevance of Nash Equilibrium to Psychiatric Disorders.Tassos Patokos - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (4):245-258.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-19

Total views
4 ( #1,074,931 of 2,254,903 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #469,982 of 2,254,903 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature