Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (2):149-161 (2018)

This paper builds on a previous discussion of Stephen Mumford’s rejection of what he takes to be David Best’s argument for a distinction between purposive and aesthetic sports. That discussion concluded that Mumford’s argument misses its target, but closed by introducing a possible alternative argument, not made by Mumford, that might be thought to have the potential to secure Mumford’s conclusion. This paper considers that alternative argument, namely, the thought that the ascription of psychological predicates conceived of in terms of defeasible criteria that constitute logically good evidence could preserve Best’s claim to be making a logical point while allowing a place for intention in relation to aims and purposes in sport. It is argued that the relationship between rules and intention is such that this alternative argument cannot secure Mumford’s conclusion.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017, 2018
DOI 10.1080/17511321.2017.1311371
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,178
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

XI.—The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights.H. L. A. Hart - 1949 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49 (1):171-194.
The Aesthetic in Sport.David Best - 1974 - British Journal of Aesthetics 14 (3):197-213.
The Ascription of Responsibility and Rithts.H. L. A. Hart - 1949 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49:171.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Logic, Rules and Intention: The Principal Aim Argument.Leon Culbertson - 2017 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 11 (4):440-452.
Intention, Description and the Aesthetic: The by-Product Argument.Leon Culbertson - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3):440-453.
Purism and the Category of ‘the Aesthetic’: The Drama Argument.Leon Culbertson - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44 (1):1-14.
Intention, Teleology, and God.Bradley Gordon Beach - 1998 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
On the Argument That Enhancement is "Cheating".M. Schermer - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (2):85-88.
Doping and Cheating.Jan Vorstenbosch - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):166-181.
Three Rules of Distribution: One Counterexample.John Corcoran - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52:886-887.
The Logical Connection Argument.Frederick M. Stoutland - 1970 - American Philosophical Quarterly.


Added to PP index

Total views
19 ( #564,657 of 2,455,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,153 of 2,455,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes