Horray for Global Justice? Emerging Democracies in a Multipolar World

Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 7:39-66 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rising powers are fundamentally shifting the relations of power in the global economic and political landscape. International political theory, however, has so far failed to evaluate this nascent multipolarity. This article fills this lacuna by synthesizing empirical and normative modes of inquiry. It examines the transformation of sovereignty exercised by emerging democracies and focuses especially on the case of Brazil. The paper shows that – in stark contrast to emerging democracies’ foreign policy rhetoric – the ‘softening’ of sovereignty, which means that emerging powers gain as well as lose certain aspects of sovereignty, has become the norm. The paper explores this softening of sovereignty from the perspective of global justice by assessing it on the basis of globalist, statist, and internationalist conceptions of global justice. We find that the emergent multipolarity contributes in various ways to the realization of the distinct socioeconomic and political criteria of these three conceptions of global justice. However, we also point out that the transformation of sovereignty generates particular problems for the realization of all three conceptions.

Similar books and articles

Cosmopolitan justice and the league of democracies.Avia Pasternak - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):649-666.
Beyond the liberal peace project: Toward peace with justice.Harry Van Der Linden - 2001 - Journal of Social Philosophy 32 (3):419–430.
Why global justice matters.Kok-Chor Tan - 2014 - Journal of Global Ethics 10 (2):128-134.
Cosmopolitanism, Sovereignty and Global Justice.Regina Queiroz, Gabriele De Angelis & Diogo P. Aurélio - 2010 - In Regina Queiroz, Gabriele De Angelis & Diogo P. Aurélio (eds.), Sovereign Justice: Global Justice in a World of Nations. De Gruyter. pp. 161-176.
Global Distributive Justice: An Introduction.Chris Armstrong - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cosmopolitanism and Global Justice.Charles R. Beitz - 2005 - The Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):11-27.
Global Justice, Historical Justice.Andrew Stark - 2012 - Political Theory 40 (5):543-572.
The emerging domain of the political.David M. Rasmussen - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (4-5):457-466.
Global Bioethics and Political Theory.Joseph Millum - 2012 - In J. Millum & E. J. Millum (eds.), Global Justice and bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 17-42.
Two conceptions of state sovereignty and their implications for global institutional design.Miriam Ronzoni - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):573-591.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-18

Downloads
123 (#141,992)

6 months
43 (#88,114)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Culp
American University of Paris

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy.Michael Blake - 2001 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3):257-296.
Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots.David Miller - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (1-2):63-81.
Two conceptions of state sovereignty and their implications for global institutional design.Miriam Ronzoni - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (5):573-591.
A political constitution for the pluralist world society?Jürgen Habermas - 2007 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34 (3):331–343.
A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society?Jürgen Habermas - 2013 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 40 (3-4):226-238.

View all 8 references / Add more references