Imitation versus communication: Testing for human-like intelligence

Minds and Machines 19 (2):237-254 (2009)
Turing’s Imitation Game is often viewed as a test for theorised machines that could ‘think’ and/or demonstrate ‘intelligence’. However, contrary to Turing’s apparent intent, it can be shown that Turing’s Test is essentially a test for humans only. Such a test does not provide for theorised artificial intellects with human-like, but not human-exact, intellectual capabilities. As an attempt to bypass this limitation, I explore the notion of shifting the goal posts of the Turing Test, and related tests such as the Total Turing Test, away from the exact imitation of human capabilities, and towards communication with humans instead. While the continued philosophical relevance of such tests is open to debate, the outcome is a different class of tests which are, unlike the Turing Test, immune to failure by means of sub-cognitive questioning techniques. I suggest that attempting to instantiate such tests could potentially be more scientifically and pragmatically relevant to some Artificial Intelligence researchers, than instantiating a Turing Test, due to the focus on producing a variety of goal directed outcomes through communicative methods, as opposed to the Turing Test’s emphasis on ‘fooling’ an Examiner.
Keywords Communication  Imitation Game  Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence  Turing Test
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-009-9149-3
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,126
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff - 1980 - University of Chicago Press.
Computing Machinery and Intelligence.Alan M. Turing - 1950 - Mind 59 (October):433-60.
The Turing Test: The First Fifty Years.Robert French - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):115-121.
Minds, Machines and Turing: The Indistinguishability of Indistinguishables.Stevan Harnad - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):425-445.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Truly Total Turing Test.Paul Schweizer - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (2):263-272.
Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game.Gualtiero Piccinini - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
Who's Afraid of the Turing Test?Dale Jacquette - 1993 - Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
Human Intelligence and Turing Test.Adam Drozdek - 1998 - AI and Society 12 (4):315-321.
Look Who's Moving the Goal Posts Now.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):41-51.
Undecidability in the Imitation Game.Y. Sato & T. Ikegami - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test.Saul Traiger - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
The Status and Future of the Turing Test.James H. Moor - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence.Susan G. Sterrett - 2000 - Minds and Machines 10 (4):541-559.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

57 ( #92,432 of 2,171,811 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,811 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums