Philosophy of Science 62 (3):438-458 (1995)
I respond to H. M. Collins's claim (1985, 1990, 1993) that experimental inquiry cannot be objective because the only criterium experimentalists have for determining whether a technique is "working" is the production of "correct" (i.e., the expected) data. Collins claims that the "experimenters' regress," the name he gives to this data-technique circle, cannot be broken using the resources of experiment alone. I argue that the data-technique circle, can be broken even though any interpretation of the raw data produced by techniques is theory-dependent. However, it is possible to break this circle by eliminating dependence on even those theoretical presuppositions that are shared by an entire scientific community through the use of multiple independently theory-dependent techniques to produce robust bodies of data. Moreover, I argue, that it is the production of robust bodies of data that convinces experimentalists of the objectivity of their data interpretations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Model Robustness as a Confirmatory Virtue: The Case of Climate Science.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:58-68.
Intervention, Causal Reasoning, and the Neurobiology of Mental Disorders: Pharmacological Drugs as Experimental Instruments.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 43 (2):542-551.
Theory-Laden Experimentation.Samuel Schindler - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):89-101.
Pluralism and Objectivity: Exposing and Breaking a Circle.Anna Leuschner - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):191-198.
Evidential Variety as a Source of Credibility for Causal Inference: Beyond Sharp Designs and Structural Models.François Claveau - 2011 - Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (3):233-253.
Similar books and articles
Evolutionary Discovery of Fuzzy Concepts in Data.Lewis L. H. Chung & Keith C. C. Chan - 2003 - Brain and Mind 4 (2):253-268.
Sharing Data is a Shared Responsibility.Joe Giffels - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):801-803.
Mental Models in Data Interpretation.Clark A. Chinn & William F. Brewer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):219.
Using Experimental Data and Analysis in EEG Modelling.Donald L. Rowe & James Wright - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):828-829.
Data Models and the Acquisition and Manipulation of Data.Todd Harris - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1508-1517.
In Defense of Experimental Data in a Relativistic Milieu.Siu L. Chow - 1995 - Philosophical Explorations.
Producing a Robust Body of Data with a Single Technique.Gregory Gandenberger - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (3):381-399.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads49 ( #107,961 of 2,178,151 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,151 )
How can I increase my downloads?