Argumentation 16 (2):197-229 (2002)
In recent and not so recent years, fallacy theory has sustained numerous challenges, challenges which have seen the theory charged with lack of systematicity as well as failure to deliver significant insights into its subject matter. In the following discussion, I argue that these criticisms are subordinate to a more fundamental criticism of fallacy theory, a criticism pertaining to the lack of intelligibility of this theory. The charge of unintelligibility against fallacy theory derives from a similar charge against philosophical theories of truth and rationality developed by Hilary Putnam. I examine how Putnam develops this charge in the case of the conception of rationality pursued by logical positivism. Following that examination, I demonstrate the significance of this charge for how we proceed routinely to analyse one informal fallacy, the fallacy of petitio principii. Specifically, I argue that the significance of this charge lies in its issuance of a rejection of the urge to theorise in fallacy inquiry in general and petitio inquiry in particular. My conclusion takes the form of guidelines for the post-theoretical pursuit of fallacy inquiry
|Keywords||certainty completeness dialectic Hilary Putnam logical positivism metaphysical standpoint petitio principii rationality theory unintelligibility|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rejecting the Urge to Theorise in Fallacy Inquiry.Louise Cummings - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):61-94.
Formal Dialectic in Fallacy Inquiry: An Unintelligible Circumscription of Argumentative Rationality? [REVIEW]Louise Cummings - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):161-183.
Self-Refutations and Much More: The Dialectical Thinking of Hilary Putnam.Louise Cummings - 2001 - Theoria 16 (2):237-268.
The Metaphoric Fallacy to a Deductive Inference.Brian Lightbody & Berman Michael - 2010 - Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice 30 (2):185-193.
The 'Passes-For' Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking.William Goodwin - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):363-374.
Common Nonsense: 25 Fallacies About Life (and Their Solutions).Cliff Ermatinger - 2005 - Circle Press.
Petitio Principii and Circular Argumentation as Seen From a Theory of Dialectical Structures.Gregor Betz - 2010 - Synthese 175 (3):327-349.
Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy.John P. Crossley Jr - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121 - 134.
Moral Monads and Ethical Reductionism.Arthur Zucker - 1984 - Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (1):116 - 122.
The Possibility of Metaphysics: Environmental Ethics and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Andrew J. Kerr - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (1):85-99.
A Characterization of the One-Sidedness Fallacy Within the Framework of the Cognitive Distortions.Dr Paul Franceschi - manuscript
Added to index2010-09-11
Total downloads17 ( #278,335 of 2,152,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,478 of 2,152,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.