Authors
James Blackmon
San Francisco State University
Martin Roth
Drake University
Abstract
In “On Begging the Systematicity Question,” Wayne Davis criticizes the suggestion of Cummins et al. that the alleged systematicity of thought is not as obvious as is sometimes supposed, and hence not reliable evidence for the language of thought hypothesis. We offer a brief reply.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1053-8364
DOI jpr20053047
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Levels of Explanation Vindicated.Víctor M. Verdejo & Daniel Quesada - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (1):77-88.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Begging the Systematicity Question.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:399-404.
On Begging the Systematicity Question.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:399-404.
Systematicity.Robert Cummins - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (12):591-614.
Systematicity Redux.Brian P. McLaughlin - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):251-274.
The Systematicity Arguments.Kenneth Aizawa - 2003 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
On the Systematicity of Language and Thought.Kent Johnson - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy 101 (3):111-139.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
63 ( #173,972 of 2,462,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #179,042 of 2,462,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes