A Reply To Peter Dear's ‘religion, Science And Natural Philosophy: Thoughts On Cunningham's Thesis’

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):387-391 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion, science and natural philosophy: thoughts on Cunningham's thesis.Peter Dear - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):377-386.
Reply to Andrew Cunningham.Peter Dear - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (2):393-395.
¿Hacía Galileo experimentos? (Did Galileo do experiments?).José Romo - 2005 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 20 (1):5-23.
Are science and religion natural enemies?Peter G. Woolcock - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):1.
First-Person Externalism.Lynne Rudder Baker - 2007 - Modern Schoolman 84 (2/3):155-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
94 (#176,431)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references