Faith and Philosophy 24 (2):165-184 (2007)
In his June 1643 letter to Princess Elizabeth, Descartes makes a claim that is a bit surprising given the hyper-intellectualism of the Meditations and other texts. He says that philosophy is something that we should do only rarely. Here I show how Descartes’ recommendation falls out of other components of his system—in particular his stoicism and his views on embodiment. A consequence of my reading is that to an important degree the reasoning of the Fourth Meditation is the imprecise reasoning of a not-yet-Cartesian meditator
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
La Première Méditation de Descartes et le De beata vita d'Augustin.Laurence Devillairs - 2001 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):119-132.
Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections From the Objections and Replies.René Descartes - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Cartesian Essays: A Collection of Critical Studies.Bernd Magnus, James Benjamin Wilbur & Laurence J. Lafleur (eds.) - 1970 - The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Reason, Will, and Sensation: Studies in Descartes's Metaphysics.John Cottingham (ed.) - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
Descartes' Error, with Reference to the Third and Fourth Meditations.Olli Lagerspetz - 2010 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):303-320.
Descartes' Dualism: Correcting Some Misconceptions.Andrea Christofidou - 2001 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):215-238.
Argument and Persuasion in Descartes' Meditations.Tom Vinci - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (4):497-498.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #217,445 of 2,163,694 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,898 of 2,163,694 )
How can I increase my downloads?