A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled

Essays in Philosophy 9 (1):55-76 (2008)

Abstract

I aim to identify and describe some basic elements of a Rawlsian approach that may help us to think conscientiously about how, from the standpoint of justice, we should treat the disabled. Rawls has been criticized for largely ignoring issues of this sort. These criticisms lose their appeal, I suggest, when we distinguish between a Rawlsian standpoint and the limited project Rawls mainly undertakes in A Theory of Justice. There his explicit aim is to find principles of justice, which are to govern the basic structures of a closed, well-ordered society that exists under reasonably favorable conditions, that would be chosen by parties in the original position from among a small set of traditional conceptions of justice. Once we develop a conception of justice for a society like that, Rawlsians hope we can make certain revisions to find principles of justice for a society like ours. Finally, I sketch what seems to me a plausible way for a Rawlsian to begin thinking about how a society like ours should provide justice for its disabled citizens.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
90 (#132,948)

6 months
2 (#257,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Adam Cureton
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Disability and Justice.Christie Hartley - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (2):120-132.
Disability and Justice.David Wasserman - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Just Design.Matteo Bianchin & Ann Heylighen - 2018 - Design Studies 54:1-22.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Would a Rawlsian Ethos of Justice Look Like?Michael G. Titelbaum - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (3):289-322.
The Limits of Rawlsian Justice.Roberto Alejandro - 1998 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Religious Belief in a Rawlsian Society.Richard L. Fern - 1987 - Journal of Religious Ethics 15 (1):33 - 58.
The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work.Lars Lindblom - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):577-599.
Contractarianism and Cooperation.Cynthia A. Stark - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (1):73-99.
Rawlsian Justice.Fabienne Peter - 2009 - In Paul Anand, Prastanta Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (eds.), Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press. pp. 433--456.