Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S424- (2001)
I argue that all current research programs in quantum gravity conform to the 17th century hypothetico-deductive model of scientific inquiry, perhaps of necessity given the current state of technology. In so far as they do not recognize and advertise the shortcomings of the research method they use, they do a disservice to the integrity of science, for the method admits of far less certainty accruing to its products than one would be led to believe by the pronouncements of researchers in the area
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
On the Existence of Spacetime Structure.Erik Curiel - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axw014.
The Role of Heuristic Appraisal in Conflicting Assessments of String Theory.Kristian Camilleri & Sophie Ritson - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 51:44-56.
Similar books and articles
Spacetime and the Philosophical Challenge of Quantum Gravity.Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham - 2001 - In Physics Meets Philosophy at the Panck Scale. Cambridge University Press.
Quantum Concepts in Space and Time.Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1986 - New York ;Oxford University Press.
Pre-Socratic Quantum Gravity.Gordon Belot & John Earman - 2001 - In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press. pp. 213--55.
Quantum Gravity: Time is the Red Herring and Classical Mathematics is the Elephant in the Room.D. A. Ford - manuscript
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #77,579 of 2,172,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?