Hawkes’ Ladder, Underdetermination, and the Mind’s Capacities

In Thomas Wynn, Karenleigh A. Overmann & Frederick L. Coolidge (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Archaeology. Oxford University Press. pp. 1107–1128 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At base, cognitive archaeology is in the business of using the archaeological record as an inroad to the abilities and expressions of past human minds. This does important work: explaining assemblages and patterns in the record, reconstructing past societies and people, as well as testing and probing hypotheses about minds and their evolution. However, there is often a long bow to be drawn from material traces to cognition; archaeological interpretation is often underdetermined. Using “Hawkes’ ladder” as a foil and drawing on two cases of Neandertal cognition (mourning and numeracy), this chapter argues that hypotheses concerning cognitive features are not beyond archaeological inference. However, such hypotheses are often “thin”: concerning the capacities of past minds, as opposed to specific meanings or functions. Nonetheless, establishing thin hypotheses is critically important for at least two reasons. First, many productive debates in archaeology are about the cognitive requirements behind specific material traces. Second, establishing thin hypotheses about capacities is often necessary for disambiguating more detailed ideas about meaning and function, or about evolutionary histories, which affords both exploring cognitive possibility and potentially finding ways of testing between these. Inferential strategies in cognitive archaeology then can progressively circumscribe narrower forms of underdetermination, constraining and exploring the space of cognitive possibility.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitive Archaeology Meets Cultural Evolutionary Psychology.Ross Pain - 2024 - In Thomas Wynn, Karenleigh A. Overmann & Frederick L. Coolidge (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Archaeology. Oxford University Press. pp. 1149-1168.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-07-27

Downloads
7 (#1,641,439)

6 months
6 (#876,365)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Adrian Currie
Cambridge University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references