Narratives, mechanisms and progress in historical science

Synthese 191 (6):1-21 (2014)

Authors
Adrian Currie
Cambridge University
Abstract
Geologists, Paleontologists and other historical scientists are frequently concerned with narrative explanations targeting single cases. I show that two distinct explanatory strategies are employed in narratives, simple and complex. A simple narrative has minimal causal detail and is embedded in a regularity, whereas a complex narrative is more detailed and not embedded. The distinction is illustrated through two case studies: the ‘snowball earth’ explanation of Neoproterozoic glaciation and recent attempts to explain gigantism in Sauropods. This distinction is revelatory of historical science. I argue that at least sometimes which strategy is appropriate is not a pragmatic issue, but turns on the nature of the target. Moreover, the distinction reveals a counterintuitive pattern of progress in some historical explanation: shifting from simple to complex. Sometimes, historical scientists rightly abandon simple, unified explanations in favour of disunified, complex narratives. Finally I compare narrative and mechanistic explanation, arguing that mechanistic approaches are inappropriate for complex narrative explanations
Keywords Explanation  Narrative  Mechanism  Historical science   Scientific progress
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0317-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Simplicity, one-shot hypotheses and paleobiological explanation.Adrian Currie - 2019 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 41 (1):10.
Introduction: Scientific Knowledge of the Deep Past.Adrian Currie & Derek Turner - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:43-46.
Testing Hypotheses in Macroevolution.Lindell Bromham - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:47-59.
A Second Look at the Colors of the Dinosaurs.Derek D. Turner - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:60-68.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Science as (Historical) Narrative.M. Norton Wise - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (3):349-376.
Truth in Interpretation: The Case of Psychoanalysis.Paul A. Roth - 1991 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (2):175-195.
Understanding Narrative Explanation.Björn Eriksson - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):317-344.
The Logical Skeleton of Darwin's Historical Methodology.Mary B. Williams - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:514 - 521.
Varieties and Vagaries of Historical Explanation.Paul Roth - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):214-226.
The Truth About Conquest: Joshua as History, Narrative, and Scripture.L. Daniel Hawk - 2012 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (2):129-140.
A Problem of Our Own Making: Roth on Historical Explanation.John Zammito - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):244-249.
The Role of Joint Experience in Historical Narratives.Axel Seemann - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):201-229.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
45 ( #159,817 of 2,319,369 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #339,798 of 2,319,369 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature